The Battle of Los Angeles

Rage Against the Machine – The Battle of Los Angeles: B-Side Breakdown 87 (B+) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Battle of Los Angeles by Rage Against the Machine
Released September 1999
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Rage Against the Machine

The Battle of Los Angeles

87
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 7 critics · 86% approval
B-Side Breakdown87Grade: B+
Approval86%6 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Rage Against the Machine's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Rage Against the Machine (86). The best-reviewed album of 1999 we've tracked.

020406080100NME: 70Rolling Stone: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 87Entertainment Weekly: 95The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 100Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 87
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 4/4 100
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia A 95
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 8.7/10 87
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipedia 7/10 70

More from Rage Against the Machine

See all Rage Against the Machine albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 1999

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply