Based on 14 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 91.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jeff Jensen | A- | 91 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Erik Adams | B- | 81 | 2010 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rob Parker | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “Every time a new [a]Weezer[/a] album comes out the number of people bearing residual good will towards them slowly shrinks (especially when they don’t send out any review copies until…” |
| Alternative Press via Wikipediaby Scott Heisel | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spectrum Culture | 3.8/5 | 76 | “Weezer Hurley Rating: 3.8/5.0 Label: Epitaph Adding to their oeuvre of novel album covers, Weezer’s latest features a picture of actor Jorge Garcia. This mysterious cover boy, for those unfamiliar,…” | |
| Beats Per Minute | 75% | 75 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby David Marchese | 7/10 | 70 | 2010 | “Such is the predictable cycle of pre-release Weezer buzz that Rivers Cuomo fans must've been skeptical upon hearing that, on the new Hurley, their hero” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Hurley on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| PopMatters | 6/10 | 60 | “Is it completely unreasonable to expect something resembling actual music from Weezer at this point? It has to be one of the most puzzling and enduring” | |
| musicOMH | 3/5 | 60 | “There are two camps of Weezer fans: those who will only love the first two albums, no matter what Rivers Cuomo and company do, and those who are along for” | |
| Slant | 3/5 | 60 | “Hurley favors scripted wackiness and blog fodder over the depth and sincerity that have made Weezer’s best work so endearing.” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 5.0/10 | 50 | 2010 | “Weezer return to basics on their eighth album, and first for Epitaph Records.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 2/5 | 40 | 2010 | “The new one from Weezer follows a long-etablished trend, says Michael Hann – that of not being as good as their first three albums” |
More from Weezer
More Indie & Alternative from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply